But don’t let gentrifying non-profits take the helm! See: AAFE
-
-
Antwort an @breadpipeline
yes!!! clts should be CLTs only - no other nonprofit bs
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 5 Gefällt mir -
-
Antwort an @ceaweaver @breadpipeline
clt's shouldn't be led by non-profits with purposes outside of hosting the CLT - it allows the source of funding to be more direct and like streamlines processes
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @loud_socialist @breadpipeline
I think the way you’re describing it a CLT is a hyper local non-profit landlord
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @ceaweaver @breadpipeline
ok i think you're right and i am stupid
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @loud_socialist @breadpipeline
Lol, that’s not what I said! But I do think interrogating what CLTs can be is important, and in my opinion, we need to focus on robust public funding and a plan to scale-up the model
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
And it’s not surprising that existing large social service orgs are a convenient way to do that and would be hard pressed to find an alternative to that in current political/economic context
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @ceaweaver @loud_socialist
Yes - one thing we were worried about is that we may be able to form CLTs but then non-profits will co-opt rather quickly
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @breadpipeline @loud_socialist
Not just non-profits - possibility of cooptation v high imo
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir
By which I mean like ... for profits, lol. or just anyone
20:44 - 21. Dez. 2020
0 Antworten
0 Retweets
0 Gefällt mir
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.